The demonstration set containing the search software, manual and one
of the five data bases is only $18. Complete data bases are
available for six dollars/disk and you can go back to ’82 with a few
of them. The data bases available are : Computer Literacy; Micro
hardware/software; Basic skills; Educational technology; and
Library/Information science. Get all of the info from ERIC
Clearinghouse on Information Resources, 030 Huntington Hall, Syra
cuse Univ., Syracuse NY 13210.
Sensible sensitivity
RT over at Sensible has been a new addition to the WLN (not the
bibliographic utility) reader list. I guess he got tired of reading
all the spelling mistakes and sent a copy of Sensible Speller over.
(Actually I asked for a review copy)
The “other” spelling checkers I’ve used were slow, required two
drives and were too much trouble to play with. Anyway a “user
interactive” newsletter is nice way to kill a half hour.
Sensible Speller is quicker than all of those “others” that I’ve
tried, it runs fine on one drive, and there is a ProDOS based
version. After boting it’s simple to customize the program (and
Appleworks is one of the options). Using the program is simple,
quick, and the only pain is adding words to a ‘user defined’
dictionary (you have to have a formatted disk). We used it to do
this month’s issue, and you can see the quality is up considerably.
Not only that it read all of this good sized (28k+) file and
corrected all of the errors in less than ten minutes. You can
install it on hard disk, it reads ProDOS, and runs like a bunny.
Definitely carries the Wired Librarian’s Seal of Approval.
In The Real World (A new feature)
BS (read more of our exploits later) suggested that since I read so
much the “other” literature that it would be nice if I placed some
of the stuff I thought important from the micro world in short form
for the library world. As always scope out the full blown article –
don’t rely on my stilted comments….
“16 Bit Apple II?”
Infoworld (5 Nov 84) reports on a new member of the 6502 clan
numbered 65816. It should run all existing Apple II software yet
give the new family 16 meg of addressable RAM. Compare that to the
3 meg max f the blue AT and my old II Plus keeps lookin’ better
every day.
“NEA Seal (Steal?) of approval”
The Computing Teacher ran an editorial in their October ’84 issue
decrying the NEA “seal” program. In November the NEA replied
weakly. Dec/Jan had a letter and in February you can look in those
some pages for my response. In a sentence: Go ahead and see if it
has the seal then buy it from somebody else other than the NEA
distributor. If a group as large as they are has to rape the
software producers in order to run the show then something is rotten
in Denmark.
“Elements of Software Success”
Off and on over the last month John (right inside the back cover)
Dvorak has been running a series of articles of the same title in
his Inside Track column in Infoworld. In the Dec. 31 issues he
raised what I call the ‘me too’ theory: “Newcomers will mostly
mimic the old times by buying what they bought.” The series is a
must read, especially for novice wired librarians.
California Dreamin’
Your humble editor was once again privileged to join forces with
about thirty other folks in the SMERC sponsored Software Forum. As
in previous years this group convenes to develop an educational
software preview guide. This listing by subject, grade level and
type is designed to help educators narrow their search for software
by representing the “best” titles we’ve seen.
This year’s list, which should be available sometime in February, is
much smaller than previous editions. From the start we took a Be
Good or Be Gone attitude which in essence removed a lot of the old
titles from the list. Only topflight software (well almost only)
made the list this year. I focused on the “tools” group, a new
category added this year to the listing. We wrestled with the
concept of developing a line between instructional tools and
productivity tools. Word processors with instructional materials
are instructional tools; word processors without are productivity
tools.
This focus on tools is a dramatic change for the Forum list which in
previous issues dropped all productivity tools as a matter of
course. My concern that the future of educational computing lies in
giving kids the skills they need to do their own work was shared by
several others and so was born the “tools committee”.