Corrections
Last Month I mentioned The Computer Coordinator from ICCE. The
correct price is $10
Library Micro News
Where in the World is Carmen SanDiego?
Nothing trips my trigger like a good simulation, and the
Broderbund folks have come up with a winner in Where in the World
Is Carmen SanDiego? The user becomes an Interpol agent and tracks
criminals around the world, gathering clues (and hopefully) solving
the case.
Kids use the World Almanac – a copy is included in the package –
to compare monetary units and capitals and a whole bunch of other
stuff to interpet information provided by Carmen (or should I say
the micro?) You jump on planes, go to various sites upon arrival,
and travel again (and again and again…) to locate the criminal.
There’s a fair amount of reality. The program gives you two weeks
per crime and it makes you sleep (although eating must be a forgone
conclusion). Solve the crime and you get promoted and players names
and ranks are saved to disk. If you have trouble (who doesn’t?)
getting kids to use the almanac, Carmen should do a lot for you.
(Apple ][+, ][e, ][c)
Finally an Apple Videodisk?
The CUE Newsletter (Sept 1985) reports that one of the field trips
at this years CUE conference (Oct 18-19 San Jose CA) will be to
Apple computer. Once there attendees will see “a demonstration of
several Apple ][e and Macintosh computer controlled video discs,
exploring both instrucitonal and reference functions.” To all my
critics who said “a videodisk will never run on an Apple” I would
appreciate an apology. Now all we will have to do is wait for the
honest to goodness real life product announcement.
AppleWorks for School Librarians
Hi Willow Research and Publishing (PO Box 1801, Fayetteville, AR
72702) forwarded a copy of Appleworks for School Librarians by May
Lien Ho. The first copy is $20 (with a template disk) and additional
copies (sans disk) are $10 each.
Being an AppleWorks enthusiast (and having done the Primer of
Library Microcomputing based on the same software) I was excited to
see the book. Unfortunately it is more AppleWorks that it is
libraries. It tries to duplicate the excellent Apple disk based
intro to the program ad doesn’t get into library applications often
till the end of a chapter.
There is an excellent chapter on Dave Loertscher’s “Collection
Mapping” scheme, complete with sample templates. If you have yet to
get into this rather theory yet, AFSL is perhaps the best short
attack I’ve seen.
The templates included in the package are ho-hum but solid. They
are not very sophisticated . References to Naumer (bad sorts) made
me even more skeptical. Still with all of these shortcomings it
should be a usefull title. I only wish it had been more library.
Rumors again
last month I predicted that Apple would have some announcements,
and I held off this month’s issue for exactly that reason. I hit
three of four: there is a 20 meg drive for the Mac that you can
daisy chain with another drive (floppy or hard) from the external
drive port for the steal of $1495. The $399 one meg card for the
Aple ][e was announced along with the 3 ˝” 800K drives for that
family (watch AppleWorks now) along with new monitors and the Image
Writer ][ (4 colors ad 160 cps and a slot for 32K buffer and a built
in Appletalk connector). The only one I blew was the 2meg Mac.
The Cave and other Antediluvian Mentalities
I have been promoting the use of a CD ROM as an interlibrary loan
tool, and have become involved in some heavey duty arguments about
the wisdom of such a know location tool. The argument usually occurs
when a user of an expensive, online bibliographic utility who
laments that the system they are using “is the one, the common
bibliographic utility from which all librarians will be able to pool
bibliographic efforts and to interlibrary loan as well.”
I know L.B. is going to turn over in her grave (okay so she’s not
there yet but WLN: not the bibliographic utility has always been
optimistic) but I have a basic feeling about ILL: short and sweet
the requesting library should bear the burden of the request.. This
means requesting from a known location with such things as the call
number so the filling library need not go to their catalog and
bother locating where it should be.
A good part of library automation has been directed toward
providing “known locations” because blind searching, making a
request without a know location, is the labor (ie expensive)
process. Our friend, who begins the argument, of course uses a
utility where such information is not displayed, but this is
disposed as an “unimportant concern.”
“You’re taking the library world back to the ‘50’s” he/she
continues “and besides that you’re data base will be only issued
when it is economically feasible (when you get enough additions to
make producing another CD ROM cost effective) and we have to have
instantaneous access.”
Me sainted pappy, who idea of using a library is taking his
granddaughter there for something to do, has a saying: “You get what
you pay for.” You rarely see Mercedes dealers offer 7.7% financing
ad the online bibliographic vendors are the same way. Why should the
“little libraries”, the libraries who can’t afford $1.80
bibliographic records even dream of having them? I mean that’s
revolutionary as the regular joe taxpayers (ie youse and me) getting
excited cause the fortune 500 companies pay little or no tax. If
Ronnie (insert your own bibliographic utility) says it’s for the
good of the country (libraries) then we should not question the cost
or the mode of delivery.
“If you develop another tool, then we would need to use two
different systems to do our Interlibrary Loan” is usually the next
retort. If I point out that perhaps this tool might have known
locations for stuff that’s not in their expensive online tool the
reply almost universally is “but we don’t need that sort of material
anyway. “The real question, or bottom line is 180 degrees from their
argument. Perhaps as much as 5% of the library community can afford
Mercedes online bibliographic utilities. They only grimace
internally at exhorbitant record and transaction charges, but unless
you want to play ball with them and their world, then you’ll just
have to do without.